Photographs in the Blue Hour
The Blue Hour - Manhattan, New York City

Jan 20th

2012

CategoryPosted in Architecture
Comments Comments 4

Photographs in the Blue Hour

Another dusk shot from New York City – this time high above the streets of Midtown Manhattan, looking north east. The last glow of the embers of the sunset to my left is visible reflected in the buildings facing west. This transition from ambient to artificial lighting – when ambient light in the sky is in the same register as the city lights – is called crossover lighting. It only lasts a few minutes: shoot too early and the city lights are overpowered by the light in the sky; too late and the sky has faded to black. Light levels fall very quickly, and it is necessary to meter the exposure frequently. Many photographers pack up once the sun has dipped below the horizon, but this time – the ‘blue hour‘ – is one of my favourite times to photograph both cityscapes and landscapes.  When everyone else has headed home or is with friends at the restaurant, the bar, or the show, and you are still huddled over your tripod on a windy rooftop, fumbling with your gear in the dark as the temperature plummets, it is tempting to pack up and follow suit.  However shooting at this time can produce an aesthetic which cannot be achieved any other way, and which I find magical and worth waiting for.

"The Blue Hour" - New York City (© 2012 Ian Mylam)

“The Blue Hour” – New York City (© 2012 Ian Mylam)

Comments (4)
  1. 20 January 2012 at 8:06 AM

    I agree, and as this shot demonstrates it’s clearly worth the effort.

  2. 20 January 2012 at 3:12 PM

    Thanks Dave. So often, we go the extra mile in the hope of getting a special shot, and come away empty-handed. However, when it all comes together, it’s makes up for all the disappointments we may have experienced before: the discomfort, mistakes and failed attempts are all forgotten, and the sense of satisfaction and pleasure with what we have produced are what we remember. Ultimately, we don’t remember the shots we failed to make; but rather, the ones which were a success.

  3. 22 January 2012 at 6:35 AM

    Yes I’m very much agreed with you Ian. Very good work and perfectly described.

  4. 23 January 2012 at 2:47 AM

    Thanks for your kind comments, Apratim.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be shared or published. Required fields are marked *

Anti-SPAM verification question: *